Exploring Existing Embedding Solutions: Do I Really Need One?

Once I wrapped my head around embeddings, I started looking into how existing products were implementing them. Some tools offer out-of-the-box solutions for generating embeddings and searching them efficiently. Things like Pinecone or Weaviate promise seamless integrations, but they come with their own costs and complexities. I also explored how some apps leverage pre-built embeddings from models like GPT or BERT, which seem like solid options when you need high-quality, general-purpose embeddings.

The more I researched, though, the more I realized that most of these solutions were either too expensive or overkill for what I wanted to do with Empirical. I don’t need a huge database of embeddings just yet—just enough to keep things smooth and contextually aware for a relatively small set of users.



AI (8) sewing (7) recycling (7) bags (7) software engineering (5) tech debt (4) software design (4) prompt engineering (4) ecommerce (4) Product Management (4) OpenAI (4) Empirical (4) context (3) architecture (3) Research (3) Learning (3) Hexagons (3) Embeddings (3) Board Game (3) 3-d Printing (3) twitter bootstrap (2) natural language (1) github pages (1) gardening (1) TypeScript (1) Streamlit (1) React (1) Modular AI (1) Makers Journey (1) Machine Learning (1) MVC (1) LoRA (1) Ionic (1) Heartbeat (1) Flan-T5 (1) Firebase (1) DaisyUI (1) DIY (1) Cosine Search (1) Context (1) Azure DevOps (1)

Thoughts & Ideas

  • Matt Gauzza